Conan the (Borrow-Checking) Barbarian
Hello Protocols, Packets, and Programs,
I realize it’s been a while since we’ve asked,
“Conan, what is best in DevOps?”
“To crush your memories,
To see control flows before you,
And to hear the sanitations of their pointer.”
The Rust programming language takes a “borrowing” approach to memory safety that focuses on ownership rules for values. It might not feel intuitive at first, but I find its semantics force thoughtful considerations about the use of objects and data structures. I’ve always been a fan of correctness first, so I’m willing to trade up front mental effort for compile-time guarantees.
The Go programming language relies on a garbage collector to achieve memory safety. I’ve done a little bit of Go. The syntax feels different, but some brief exposure to OCaml helped me get a sense of it rather quickly.
The C programming language relies on pure luck. And LLVM’s AddressSanitizer.
The C++ programming language relies on scoped std::pure luck, reference counting, and LLVM’s AddressSanitizer.
Regarding the news segment, the Top 10 CI/CD security risks is now an official OWASP project.
And as another note on the news segment, the nod to “Outpost 31” is a reference to the movie, The Thing. It’s one of my all time absolute favorite films. I couldn’t pass up a mention of Antarctica without noting it.